<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Security &amp; Access</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forcecertified.com/2008/10/27/security-access/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forcecertified.com/2008/10/27/security-access/</link>
	<description>A free resource for Salesforce.com certification</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 13:08:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anand</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2008/10/27/security-access/comment-page-1/#comment-3227</link>
		<dc:creator>Anand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 01:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/security-access/#comment-3227</guid>
		<description>Just comment, Sharing rules don&#039;t apply to Queue. Only to public group, roles and roles &amp; subordinates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just comment, Sharing rules don&#8217;t apply to Queue. Only to public group, roles and roles &amp; subordinates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2008/10/27/security-access/comment-page-1/#comment-3226</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 10:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/security-access/#comment-3226</guid>
		<description>Hierarchy does not apply for folder access.

Love this site, it&#039;s really helpful for my Certified Admin&#039; preparation. 

To complement this section, there&#039;s a nice blog post on security here: http://www.shellblack.com/SFDC/implementing/security/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hierarchy does not apply for folder access.</p>
<p>Love this site, it&#8217;s really helpful for my Certified Admin&#8217; preparation. </p>
<p>To complement this section, there&#8217;s a nice blog post on security here: <a href="http://www.shellblack.com/SFDC/implementing/security/" rel="nofollow">http://www.shellblack.com/SFDC/implementing/security/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keerthana</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2008/10/27/security-access/comment-page-1/#comment-2750</link>
		<dc:creator>keerthana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/security-access/#comment-2750</guid>
		<description>Does access to folders roll-up through role hierarchy ?

If a person in the lower role has created a folder. Does the person in the higher role have access to it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does access to folders roll-up through role hierarchy ?</p>
<p>If a person in the lower role has created a folder. Does the person in the higher role have access to it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tharunj</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2008/10/27/security-access/comment-page-1/#comment-2324</link>
		<dc:creator>tharunj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/security-access/#comment-2324</guid>
		<description>Keerthana,

(From the SFDC Help page)

When transferring accounts and their related data in Professional, Enterprise, Unlimited, and Developer Editions, all previous access granted by manual sharing, Apex managed sharing, or sharing rules is removed. New sharing rules are then applied to the data based on the new owner. The new owner may need to manually share the transferred accounts and opportunities as necessary to grant access to certain users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keerthana,</p>
<p>(From the SFDC Help page)</p>
<p>When transferring accounts and their related data in Professional, Enterprise, Unlimited, and Developer Editions, all previous access granted by manual sharing, Apex managed sharing, or sharing rules is removed. New sharing rules are then applied to the data based on the new owner. The new owner may need to manually share the transferred accounts and opportunities as necessary to grant access to certain users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keerthana</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2008/10/27/security-access/comment-page-1/#comment-1825</link>
		<dc:creator>Keerthana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/security-access/#comment-1825</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for your clarification</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for your clarification</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Coppedge</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2008/10/27/security-access/comment-page-1/#comment-1818</link>
		<dc:creator>John Coppedge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/security-access/#comment-1818</guid>
		<description>Hi Keerthana,

&quot;No Access&quot; can be read more specifically as &quot;No Access to other users&#039; records&quot;.  They would have access to records they own (the only permission that would prevent this is object-level permissions).

From my understanding when you mass transfer records, sharing rules will be reevaluated based upon the new record owner.  I can&#039;t say with 100% certainty as I haven&#039;t specifically tested it.

Hope that helps!  Cheers,
John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Keerthana,</p>
<p>&#8220;No Access&#8221; can be read more specifically as &#8220;No Access to other users&#8217; records&#8221;.  They would have access to records they own (the only permission that would prevent this is object-level permissions).</p>
<p>From my understanding when you mass transfer records, sharing rules will be reevaluated based upon the new record owner.  I can&#8217;t say with 100% certainty as I haven&#8217;t specifically tested it.</p>
<p>Hope that helps!  Cheers,<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keerthana</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2008/10/27/security-access/comment-page-1/#comment-1809</link>
		<dc:creator>Keerthana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/security-access/#comment-1809</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Regarding the mass transfer of records which one is correct?

When you transfer records from one user to another, the sharing rules are reevaluated to add or remove access to the transferred records as necessary.

(or)

When you transfer records from user to another, the sharing rules are removed during the transfer. 

I saw both these statements while going through the &quot;help and Training&quot; ins alesforce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Regarding the mass transfer of records which one is correct?</p>
<p>When you transfer records from one user to another, the sharing rules are reevaluated to add or remove access to the transferred records as necessary.</p>
<p>(or)</p>
<p>When you transfer records from user to another, the sharing rules are removed during the transfer. </p>
<p>I saw both these statements while going through the &#8220;help and Training&#8221; ins alesforce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keerthana</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2008/10/27/security-access/comment-page-1/#comment-1806</link>
		<dc:creator>Keerthana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/security-access/#comment-1806</guid>
		<description>Hi,,

I have a doubt in the Describe the scope and capabilities of Organization-Wide Defaults.

In the table that is given the salesrep should have access to his own opportunities.

But it is given as &quot;No access&quot;.

Could you please explain that?

Thanks,
Keerthana</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,,</p>
<p>I have a doubt in the Describe the scope and capabilities of Organization-Wide Defaults.</p>
<p>In the table that is given the salesrep should have access to his own opportunities.</p>
<p>But it is given as &#8220;No access&#8221;.</p>
<p>Could you please explain that?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Keerthana</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Cline</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2008/10/27/security-access/comment-page-1/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Cline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 06:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/security-access/#comment-375</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your help! Taking my exam on Friday.

btw, &quot;Grant Access Using Hierarchies is cannot be disabled for standard objects.&quot; should be:

&quot;Grant Access Using Hierarchies cannot be disabled for standard objects.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your help! Taking my exam on Friday.</p>
<p>btw, &#8220;Grant Access Using Hierarchies is cannot be disabled for standard objects.&#8221; should be:</p>
<p>&#8220;Grant Access Using Hierarchies cannot be disabled for standard objects.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SF</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2008/10/27/security-access/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>SF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/security-access/#comment-237</guid>
		<description>I am taking my test tomorrow and I really appreciate the content you have put together for exam preparation.

One important thing to mention about Mass transfer of record is that they DO NOT trigger workflow rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am taking my test tomorrow and I really appreciate the content you have put together for exam preparation.</p>
<p>One important thing to mention about Mass transfer of record is that they DO NOT trigger workflow rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
