<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to restrict access to specific Salesforce Roles [you actually can&#8217;t &#8211; but here&#8217;s how to do it]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forcecertified.com/2009/07/01/how-to-restrict-access-to-specific-salesforce-roles-you-actually-cant-but-heres-how-to-do-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forcecertified.com/2009/07/01/how-to-restrict-access-to-specific-salesforce-roles-you-actually-cant-but-heres-how-to-do-it/</link>
	<description>A free resource for Salesforce.com certification</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:09:41 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ForceCertified.com</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2009/07/01/how-to-restrict-access-to-specific-salesforce-roles-you-actually-cant-but-heres-how-to-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>ForceCertified.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/how-to-restrict-access-to-specific-salesforce-roles-you-actually-cant-but-heres-how-to-do-it/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Sharing rules can accomplish sharing via record owner, so issue A is no problem.

For issue B, sharing rules would not work.  I haven&#039;t personally implemented it, but I believe territory management is precisely what you&#039;re looking for.

Cheers,
John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharing rules can accomplish sharing via record owner, so issue A is no problem.</p>
<p>For issue B, sharing rules would not work.  I haven&#8217;t personally implemented it, but I believe territory management is precisely what you&#8217;re looking for.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suma</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2009/07/01/how-to-restrict-access-to-specific-salesforce-roles-you-actually-cant-but-heres-how-to-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Suma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/how-to-restrict-access-to-specific-salesforce-roles-you-actually-cant-but-heres-how-to-do-it/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

In one of the situation a new user - John Krohn, should be given access to Lead Records where County = Northern Region AND Lead Owner = Maya Sheritt.

Notice, I am trying to give to fulfill 2 goals:-
a) John Krohn access to those LEAD Records where he is not the Lead Owner. Is that possible?

b) John Krohn, should also get access to those lead where he is not the LEAD OWNER *AND* where the County = Northern Region.

Is this possible using Sharing Rules?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>In one of the situation a new user &#8211; John Krohn, should be given access to Lead Records where County = Northern Region AND Lead Owner = Maya Sheritt.</p>
<p>Notice, I am trying to give to fulfill 2 goals:-<br />
a) John Krohn access to those LEAD Records where he is not the Lead Owner. Is that possible?</p>
<p>b) John Krohn, should also get access to those lead where he is not the LEAD OWNER *AND* where the County = Northern Region.</p>
<p>Is this possible using Sharing Rules?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
