<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ForceCertified.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forcecertified.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forcecertified.com</link>
	<description>A free resource for Salesforce.com certification</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:13:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Salesforce.com Analytics Edition [Pros and Cons] by John Coppedge</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2012/02/08/salesforce-com-analytics-edition-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-12790</link>
		<dc:creator>John Coppedge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.com/?p=921#comment-12790</guid>
		<description>KV,

The features should show up automatically, although your sandbox likely had to be created before a certain date (e.g. before 2/7).  If it still doesn&#039;t show I would either request a feature activation... or wait til Monday and it will be in prod :)

Cheers,

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KV,</p>
<p>The features should show up automatically, although your sandbox likely had to be created before a certain date (e.g. before 2/7).  If it still doesn&#8217;t show I would either request a feature activation&#8230; or wait til Monday and it will be in prod <img src='http://forcecertified.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Salesforce.com Analytics Edition [Pros and Cons] by KV</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2012/02/08/salesforce-com-analytics-edition-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-12768</link>
		<dc:creator>KV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.com/?p=921#comment-12768</guid>
		<description>Did you have to activate anything to see the analytics option? My Enterprise sandbox still doesn&#039;t see any updates.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you have to activate anything to see the analytics option? My Enterprise sandbox still doesn&#8217;t see any updates&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Salesforce.com Analytics Edition [Pros and Cons] by John Coppedge</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2012/02/08/salesforce-com-analytics-edition-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-12759</link>
		<dc:creator>John Coppedge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.com/?p=921#comment-12759</guid>
		<description>I would love to declare two unrelated objects in a single report, but that could be just me :)

Alternatively you could create an analytic snapshot and report on the joined data but that&#039;s less ideal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to declare two unrelated objects in a single report, but that could be just me <img src='http://forcecertified.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Alternatively you could create an analytic snapshot and report on the joined data but that&#8217;s less ideal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Salesforce.com Analytics Edition [Pros and Cons] by Thomas Tobin</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2012/02/08/salesforce-com-analytics-edition-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-12707</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Tobin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.com/?p=921#comment-12707</guid>
		<description>If the fields really are the same, I&#039;m not sure a single report is where I want to declare that.
Somebody has done the work of telling us what&#039;s the same, and that&#039;s in the schema, in the system of lookups and other relationships that allow us to get data.
The way we&#039;ve done it doesn&#039;t allow you to get unrelated things and just smush them together - average users won&#039;t figure out what could make sense. But they can see related lists and now bring those together on the same report...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the fields really are the same, I&#8217;m not sure a single report is where I want to declare that.<br />
Somebody has done the work of telling us what&#8217;s the same, and that&#8217;s in the schema, in the system of lookups and other relationships that allow us to get data.<br />
The way we&#8217;ve done it doesn&#8217;t allow you to get unrelated things and just smush them together &#8211; average users won&#8217;t figure out what could make sense. But they can see related lists and now bring those together on the same report&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Salesforce.com Analytics Edition [Pros and Cons] by John Coppedge</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2012/02/08/salesforce-com-analytics-edition-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-12700</link>
		<dc:creator>John Coppedge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.com/?p=921#comment-12700</guid>
		<description>Thanks all for the feedback and votes, appreciate it.

@Thomas - lead status and opportunity stage aren&#039;t the same from a data perspective, but absolutely are from a reporting perspective.  What I&#039;m suggesting in the idea I posted is that you allow users to decide what&#039;s considered &quot;common&quot; between reports so that they can mashup their data in any way that is meaningful to their organization.

Great work on Analytics Edition as well, it really is a vast improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks all for the feedback and votes, appreciate it.</p>
<p>@Thomas &#8211; lead status and opportunity stage aren&#8217;t the same from a data perspective, but absolutely are from a reporting perspective.  What I&#8217;m suggesting in the idea I posted is that you allow users to decide what&#8217;s considered &#8220;common&#8221; between reports so that they can mashup their data in any way that is meaningful to their organization.</p>
<p>Great work on Analytics Edition as well, it really is a vast improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Salesforce.com Analytics Edition [Pros and Cons] by Thomas Tobin</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2012/02/08/salesforce-com-analytics-edition-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-12698</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Tobin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.com/?p=921#comment-12698</guid>
		<description>What were you trying to join by in the leads and opportunities case?
There&#039;s nothing common between the two lists - apart from the owner (who&#039;s info was visible), there&#039;s nothing common between the two lists. We have no way of knowing that the status field should be the same between the two... the fields could just have the same name.

What you could do, if you want to join on status is:
1) create a new object; status
2) create lookups from lead and opportunity 
3) create status object records for each status you want
4) workflow rules on lead and opportunity set the lookup to status to the value from the record&#039;s status.

Then you&#039;ll be able to join them by status, and the status mapping will make sense (because you&#039;ve set it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What were you trying to join by in the leads and opportunities case?<br />
There&#8217;s nothing common between the two lists &#8211; apart from the owner (who&#8217;s info was visible), there&#8217;s nothing common between the two lists. We have no way of knowing that the status field should be the same between the two&#8230; the fields could just have the same name.</p>
<p>What you could do, if you want to join on status is:<br />
1) create a new object; status<br />
2) create lookups from lead and opportunity<br />
3) create status object records for each status you want<br />
4) workflow rules on lead and opportunity set the lookup to status to the value from the record&#8217;s status.</p>
<p>Then you&#8217;ll be able to join them by status, and the status mapping will make sense (because you&#8217;ve set it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Salesforce.com Analytics Edition [Pros and Cons] by Tyeson</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2012/02/08/salesforce-com-analytics-edition-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-12694</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyeson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.com/?p=921#comment-12694</guid>
		<description>Hi John - thanks for the quick, concise review. Imagine if you had paid steeply only to find out about the limitations on joins, common fields. So it&#039;s not really like &quot;outer joins&quot;, but &quot;sibling joins&quot;? Good to hear that bucketing works well, as in any org that has outrageous pickist organic growth like Lead Source, being able to categorize will be great. Also excited about cross-filtering. 

Hope all is well, and let me know when you&#039;re in town to catch up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John &#8211; thanks for the quick, concise review. Imagine if you had paid steeply only to find out about the limitations on joins, common fields. So it&#8217;s not really like &#8220;outer joins&#8221;, but &#8220;sibling joins&#8221;? Good to hear that bucketing works well, as in any org that has outrageous pickist organic growth like Lead Source, being able to categorize will be great. Also excited about cross-filtering. </p>
<p>Hope all is well, and let me know when you&#8217;re in town to catch up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Salesforce.com Analytics Edition [Pros and Cons] by Jonathan Maher</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2012/02/08/salesforce-com-analytics-edition-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-12693</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Maher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.com/?p=921#comment-12693</guid>
		<description>Great post, looks like this really is going to solve several of our problems.

Also, I agree the functionality expressed in your Idea would be very nice. I&#039;ve &quot;promoted&quot; it. 

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, looks like this really is going to solve several of our problems.</p>
<p>Also, I agree the functionality expressed in your Idea would be very nice. I&#8217;ve &#8220;promoted&#8221; it. </p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recorded Sessions of Dev 401 &amp; Dev 501 Salesforce Training Available Online for Free by Guru</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2009/08/14/recorded-sessions-of-dev-401-dev-501-salesforce-training-available-online-for-free/comment-page-1/#comment-12662</link>
		<dc:creator>Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.wordpress.com/2009/08/14/recorded-sessions-of-dev-401-dev-501-salesforce-training-available-online-for-free/#comment-12662</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Can some one share the PPTs of the class room training so that it will be helpful to go through the certification exam

Thanks in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Can some one share the PPTs of the class room training so that it will be helpful to go through the certification exam</p>
<p>Thanks in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recorded Sessions of Dev 401 &amp; Dev 501 Salesforce Training Available Online for Free by phaniraj</title>
		<link>http://forcecertified.com/2009/08/14/recorded-sessions-of-dev-401-dev-501-salesforce-training-available-online-for-free/comment-page-1/#comment-12570</link>
		<dc:creator>phaniraj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcecertified.wordpress.com/2009/08/14/recorded-sessions-of-dev-401-dev-501-salesforce-training-available-online-for-free/#comment-12570</guid>
		<description>Here you go... Complete Salesforce Official Training...

Definetly very helpful...

http://salesforcechannel.com/search/?search=dev%20401&amp;page=3


All the best....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here you go&#8230; Complete Salesforce Official Training&#8230;</p>
<p>Definetly very helpful&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://salesforcechannel.com/search/?search=dev%20401&#038;page=3" rel="nofollow">http://salesforcechannel.com/search/?search=dev%20401&#038;page=3</a></p>
<p>All the best&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

